toast21602

they are closed again!?! geeze.

ahhhhh nevermind. go ski.

you get an A.

haha.

thats all i'm trying to say. no need for a rant with name-calling and asumptions that you have made up. the east is nothing compared to the west. all the man asked for was an opinion on heading up to vermont and i gave it. the mountain doesnt want my type? so what is my type? oh. the type that would rather ski out west than on the east coast? let me tell ya, there are a lot of "my type" around. and also, not ONCE did i say anything about Blue being the best in easter skiing. Blue sucks. you are oviously making things up right now. i would much rather ski okemo or killington than Blue. but is the cost of a trip worth it to go up there when you could go out west? to me, no. but thats just my opinion. stupididy should be painful? yes i suppose it is stupid to say that skiing out west is better than skiing on the east coast. shit. my bad.

of course. i get wasted every weekend. go to bed before 2. wake up at 6:30. ski for a few hours. come back. take a nap. do it all over again for the next day. its worth it if i can ski nicely groomed runs without idiots all over the place and a park that is perfect.

Blue Mountain.

eh, i'm happy with any pair of skis that can last over 200 days in the park. haha. i wonder how the scratches will hold up next year...

i have no complaints with the ski at all. i love them, but i know there is better out there. for skiing over 200 days on them in the park and hitting thousands of rails i think they held up pretty damn well for the beating that they took.

i think it would be cool just to check it out one day.

or just wake your ass up and get there for opening. weekdays there is nobody around until 12 or even later. i havent had a problem with crowds more than once this year and that was a day that i showed up around 11 on a sunday.

nothing is. you are reading into it too much. let me rephrase: i would rather ski 6000' of a mountain that has above treeline stuff, steeps, and cliffs rather than what vermont has.

typo. 5000'. thanks for calling me out. haha.

i'm not talking about park either. i would just rather ski 6000' of above treeline stuff and nice steeps and cliffs and whatnot than some groomers and glades up there.

personally, i'm not a huge fan of vermont or other places up north. i dont think it is much better or bigger than here, other than receiving more snow. i would much rather save my money and ski out west because spending extra money to go to vermont doesnt seem worth it to me anymore.

eh, its a little bigger than that... maybe 30-35 max. its temp. though, and once they can blow more snow, plans are to make it much bigger. they need a bigger jump up there.

oh my 3yo foils... i have 21 cracks in one ski and 17 in the other with and edge sticking 2mm out. haha. i trash those things in the park. next year i'm getting myself some fatter skis and using my all mountain skis (scratches) in the park. the foils will be retired and turned into shotskis for friends.

yeeeeah you wouldnt want a mountain 4x the size for the same price. total rip off.

man, boulder is so expensive for how small that little place is... such a rip.

$25... and i'll meet you to pick them up.

ah too small.

damn. and i was going to hit up camelback on the way to sno tonight....

they pulled a camelback?!? wow.