Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, AirheadD8 said:

Probably a fuel containment barrier.

 That's what I have also concluded after checking some video footage from the ground. Looks like they cleaned up quite a bit by yesterday and pulled the choo-choos out of the river. That must be a logistical nightmare.

Edited by saltyant
Posted
7 minutes ago, AirheadD8 said:

Yikes, 😳that had to be a scary ride for the conductor . Luckily the cab wasn’t any further into the water. 

And not the engineer?

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, indiggio said:

And not the engineer?

 

I’m not train savvy. How many people does it take to operate?  My wife and I had a discussion the other night about there being two locomotives. Is the second one connected electronically or is there a separate crew? 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, AirheadD8 said:

I’m not train savvy. How many people does it take to operate?  My wife and I had a discussion the other night about there being two locomotives. Is the second one connected electronically or is there a separate crew? 

They have been running with minimal crews lately because of increased technology. usually a minimum of two but it depends and the load, the length, and destination usually. There are not specific crews for each engine.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

My understanding is that one crew of two people can run just about any train now. Even if there are two locomotives they are hooked up so that they are controlled by the first one. There's also a new trend of putting two locomotives in the middle of a mile plus long train that are controlled by the one in the front as well. So in that situation there could be a crew of two running 4 engines, two of which are 3/4 of a mile behind them. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Yes, a friend works for NS as a conductor and one of the biggest issues between the union and management is that the companies are trying to whittle crews down to just 1 person and eventually 0 because of all the automation.  The unions keep fighting these reductions claiming fully automated trains are too unsafe.

Posted
32 minutes ago, indiggio said:

The unions keep fighting these reductions claiming fully automated trains are too unsafe.

As 3 trains (presumably) with 2 man crews collide . . .

  • Like 1
  • 9 months later...
Posted
1 hour ago, theprogram4 said:

Which train, nj transit maybe?

Gotta be, the only other one I know that looks like that is the train that runs from Midway to Chicago but it's blue not beige/white. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, theprogram4 said:

Which train, nj transit maybe?

I was thinking NJ Transit.  Been a long time since I’ve been on that.  I used to take it from Princeton Junction to NYC with my ex.  There’s even a little 2-3 mile long line from downtown Princeton to Princeton junction called the Dinky

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, GrilledSteezeSandwich said:

I was thinking NJ Transit.  Been a long time since I’ve been on that.  I used to take it from Princeton Junction to NYC with my ex.  There’s even a little 2-3 mile long line from downtown Princeton to Princeton junction called the Dinky

NYC gets weird because they all go to Penn Station, the NEC is two level standard amtrak but unless I'm smoking crack the new trains have blue covers where only the older ones have the brown leather covers. 

I would say it's an older train not from Secacus Junction and maybe headed south. 

 

Edit: it's a Arrow https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_(railcar)

This is interesting as all other NJ/NYC traffic has unpowered cars unless I'm mistaken. 

Edited by Johnny Law
Posted

The Arrow IIIs are almost the same units as the Silverliner IVs. Different pantograph. Different seating arrangement because the doors are different. Can't remember. Either the Arrow of the Silverliner has the provision for the center door and the other doesn't. Both manufactured by GE in the 1970s. 

Posted
2 hours ago, EdBacon said:

The Arrow IIIs are almost the same units as the Silverliner IVs. Different pantograph. Different seating arrangement because the doors are different. Can't remember. Either the Arrow of the Silverliner has the provision for the center door and the other doesn't. Both manufactured by GE in the 1970s. 

Arrows have the doors, Septa which is Silverliners does not at least if my memory is correct.  Septa was allegedly getting new multilevel bombardier cars like amtrak but they broke soooooo..........still I dream to ride the rails from reading. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...